توسعه محلی (روستائی-شهری)

توسعه محلی (روستائی-شهری)

حکمرانی آب: نقش شبکه‌های اجتماعی محلی در مدیریت آب در بخش کشاورزی شهرستان دورود

نویسندگان
آرامیس سیف 1
شراره مهدی‌زاده 2
سوسن باستانی 2
مهدی مالمیر 3
1 گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصادی، دانشگاه الزهرا - تهران
2 گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصادی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران
3 گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
10.22059/jrd.2026.406504.668967
چکیده
مدیریت پایدار منابع آب، به‌ویژه در بخش کشاورزی، فراتر از مداخله‌های صرفاً فنی و سازه‌ای، در گرو توجه به سازوکارهای اجتماعی نظیر شبکه‌های اجتماعی محلی و مشارکت و همکاری متقابل آن‌ها است. هدف مطالعۀ حاضر، واکاوی ساختار بهره‌برداران آب کشاورزی در شهرستان دورود و بررسی نقش این شبکه‌ها در نحوۀ دسترسی، توزیع و مصرف آب، و نیز در تسهیل یا ممانعت از همکاری‌ها، تخصیص منابع و تصمیم‌گیری‌های جمعی دربارۀ آب در سطح جوامع محلی است.
داده‌ها به روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و با تکنیک مصاحبۀ نیمه‌ساخت‌یافته با ترکیبی از بهره‌برداران محلی (کشاورزان و باغداران)، مطلعان محلی و کارشناسان ادارۀ منابع آب و جهاد کشاورزی گردآوری و تفسیر داده‌ها به روش تحلیل مضمون انجام شد. دامنۀ نمونه‌گیری تا ۱۸ نفر گسترش یافت و با تکرار مضامین در نقطۀ اشباع نظری پایان یافت.
یافته‌های حاصل از مصاحبه‌ها شامل ۶۵ مفهوم اولیه، ۲۶ مضمون فرعی و ۷ مضمون اصلی است که دینامیک شبکۀ بهره‌برداری آب در بخش کشاورزی را در چارچوب هفت مضمون اصلی مرتبط با چارچوب نظری سرمایۀ اجتماعی، تحلیل شبکۀ اجتماعی و رویکردهای حکمرانی منابع مشترک قابل‌فهم می‌کند: «روابط همکاری و مشارکت بومی»، «نفوذ و مرجعیت محلی»، «شبکۀ محلی اطلاع‌رسانی پیرامون آب»، «الگوهای منازعه در نظام بهره‌برداری»، «نفوذ غیربومیان در شبکۀ بهره‌برداری آب»، «افول نظام بومی مشارکتی و رشد بهره‌برداری منفعت‌محور» و «روابط قدرت و رانت در نظام بهره‌برداری آب».
این مضمون‌ها نشان می‌دهد شبکه‌های اجتماعی محلی می‌توانند هم بستر مدیریت مشارکتی آب و تنظیم جمعی آن، و هم سازوکار بازتولید نابرابری و ناپایداری باشند؛ بنابراین، هرگونه سیاست‌گذاری، تصمیم‌گیری و مداخله در مدیریت آب مستلزم توجه مستقیم به پیکربندی این شبکه‌ها و جهت‌دهی به سرمایۀ اجتماعی درون آن‌ها است
کلیدواژه‌ها
حکمرانی آب
سرمایۀ اجتماعی
شبکه‌های اجتماعی محلی
شهرستان دورود
کشاورزی

عنوان مقاله English

Water Governance: The Role of Local Social Networks in Agricultural Water Management in Dorud County

نویسندگان English

Aramis Seif 1
Sharareh Mehdizadeh 2
Susan Bastani 2
Mahdi Malmir 3
1 Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Water scarcity has emerged as one of the most pressing environmental and social challenges of the twenty-first century. Although agricultural water management is often approached as a technical or hydrological issue, growing evidence suggests that patterns of water access, allocation, and use are deeply embedded in social relations, institutional arrangements, and local governance structures. In Iran, where agriculture consumes the vast majority of available water resources, persistent inefficiencies, groundwater depletion, and increasing competition over water have intensified concerns regarding the sustainability of existing management systems. At the same time, the decline of traditional participatory institutions and the predominance of top-down approaches have limited the effectiveness of many water-management interventions.
Recent scholarship has increasingly emphasized the importance of social capital, stakeholder participation, and local governance networks in achieving sustainable natural-resource management. From this perspective, water-use systems are not merely technical arrangements but social arenas in which cooperation, conflict, trust, power, and negotiation are continuously produced and reproduced. Drawing on sociological approaches to environmental governance and social network analysis, this study examines the role of local social networks in shaping agricultural water management in Dorud County, Iran. The study seeks to understand how social relations influence water access, allocation, cooperation, conflict, and decision-making processes among agricultural water users.
Method
This study adopted a qualitative–interpretive research design informed by the principles of qualitative network analysis. The research was conducted in the agricultural sector of Dorud County, located in western Iran, encompassing the Silakhor and Central districts. These areas were selected because agriculture constitutes the primary livelihood activity and water management plays a central role in local socioeconomic life.
Data were collected through purposive and referral-based sampling. Participants included farmers, orchard owners, local informants, and experts from the Regional Water Authority and the Agricultural Jihad Organization who possessed extensive knowledge of local water-use practices and stakeholder relationships. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was reached, resulting in a final sample of 18 participants.
Semi-structured interviews served as the primary data-collection method. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis following the framework proposed by Braun and Clarke. Coding and interpretation were conducted iteratively, allowing themes to emerge from participants’ experiences while also being interpreted through relevant theoretical perspectives. Particular attention was devoted to identifying patterns of interaction, cooperation, influence, conflict, and resource exchange in order to reconstruct the structure and dynamics of local water-use networks.
Findings
The findings identified 65 initial concepts, which were organized into 26 sub-themes and seven overarching themes: indigenous cooperative and participatory relations, local authority and legitimacy, local water information networks, patterns of conflict within the water-use system, the influence of non-local actors, power relations and rent-seeking networks, and the decline of indigenous participatory governance alongside the rise of profit-oriented water exploitation.
The first group of findings highlights the persistence of locally embedded forms of social capital. Traditional mechanisms such as rotational irrigation schedules, lottery-based water allocation, mediation by village elders, collective monitoring, and reciprocal exchanges among farmers continue to facilitate cooperation and contribute to the perceived fairness of water distribution. These arrangements demonstrate the continuing significance of trust, reciprocity, and collective action in managing common-pool resources.
The findings also reveal the important role of local authority structures and information networks. Village elders, respected farmers, council members, and local administrators occupy central positions within social networks and contribute to conflict resolution, information dissemination, and coordination among water users. These actors function as key intermediaries linking formal institutions with local communities and enhancing the effectiveness of local governance processes.
At the same time, the study reveals important tensions and inequalities within water-use networks. Water scarcity has intensified competition among users and contributed to the erosion of trust and cooperation. Periods of drought were frequently associated with disputes over water allocation, demonstrating how environmental pressures can weaken previously stable social relationships.
The growing influence of non-local actors has further transformed local water-use systems. The expansion of externally driven agricultural activities, particularly the cultivation of water-intensive crops, has increased pressure on water resources, altered local economic relations, and contributed to new forms of inequality. Participants also reported the emergence of informal networks facilitating unauthorized well drilling and excessive groundwater extraction.
Perhaps most significantly, the findings reveal the existence of informal power relations and rent-seeking networks that shape access to water resources. Political influence, kinship ties, and personal connections were frequently perceived as more influential than formal regulations in determining access to water and the enforcement of legal restrictions. These dynamics illustrate how social networks can function not only as sources of cooperation and collective action but also as mechanisms through which inequality, exclusion, and privileged access to resources are reproduced.
Finally, the findings indicate a gradual transformation from collectively governed and socially embedded water-management arrangements toward more individualistic and profit-oriented forms of resource exploitation. Economic pressures, environmental change, and declining water availability have weakened traditional participatory institutions and encouraged competitive rather than cooperative patterns of resource use.
Conclusion
The study demonstrates that agricultural water management in Dorud County cannot be adequately explained through technical, hydrological, or environmental factors alone. Rather, water-use practices are embedded within broader configurations of social relations, power structures, institutional arrangements, and local norms. Water therefore constitutes not only a natural resource but also a social arena through which cooperation, conflict, influence, and inequality are negotiated.
The findings underscore the dual character of social networks in water governance. On the one hand, trust-based relationships, local participation, and social cohesion facilitate collective action and contribute to sustainable resource management. On the other hand, unequal power relations, rent-seeking practices, and exclusionary networks can undermine equity, weaken institutional effectiveness, and promote unsustainable patterns of water use.
These findings suggest that effective and sustainable water governance requires moving beyond purely technical and centralized approaches toward more participatory and network-oriented forms of governance. Strengthening local social capital, supporting participatory institutions, enhancing transparency in water allocation, and fostering meaningful collaboration between governmental organizations and local communities are essential for improving the sustainability of water-resource management. Ultimately, the long-term sustainability of water resources depends not only on the quantity of available water but also on the quality of the social relationships and governance networks through which water is managed.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Agriculture
Dorud County
Local Social Networks
Social Capital
Water Governance
آقایاری هیر، محسن، خورشیددوست، علی‌محمد، عزمی، آئیژ، و شفیعی، اشکان (1401). ارزیابی پایداری اکولوژیکی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی با تأکید بر ردپای بوم‌شناختی (مورد پژوهشی: شهرستان اسلام‌آباد غرب). توسعۀ محلی (روستایی-شهری)، 14(2)، 547-۵۶۷. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrd.2023.335037.668780
ازکیا، مصطفی و فیروزآبادی، سید احمد (۱۳۸۷). بررسی سرمایۀ اجتماعی در انواع نظام­های بهره­برداری از زمین و عوامل مؤثر
در تبدیل بهره­برداری­های دهقانی به تعاونی. نامۀ علوم اجتماعی، ۱۶(۱)، ۷۷-۹۸.
https://jnoe.ut.ac.ir/article_26977.html
ابراهیمی آذرخواران، فریبا، قربانی، مهدی، ملکیان، آرش، سلاجقه، علی، علم‌بیگی، امیر، و فهمی، هدایت (۱۳۹۸). تحلیل موقعیت ذی‌نفعان در ساختار حکمرانی شبکه‌ای آب در حوزۀ آبخیز طالقان. مجلۀ علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری ایران، ۱۳(۴۶)، ۶۲-۷۳.
https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20089554.1398.13.46.9.5
باستانی، سوسن، کمالی، افسانه، و صالحی هیکویی، مریم (۱۳۸۷). سرمایۀ اجتماعی شبکه و اعتماد متقابل بین‌شخصی. مجلۀ دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه خوارزمی، ۱۶(۶۱)، 41-81. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/337831
حسام، مهدی و نگهبان، سعید (1399). بررسی شبکۀ روابط اجتماعی بهره‌برداران از منابع آب در راستای مدیریت بهینه (مطالعۀ موردی: نخلستان‌های بخش شرقی شهر فدامی، شهرستان داراب). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی (پژوهش‌های جغرافیایی)، 52(۲)، 501-514. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2018.261417.1007735
حب‌وطن، محمد (۱۳۹۶). تیپولوژی سرمایۀ آبی و سرمایۀ اجتماعی در کشور. نشریۀ آب و توسعۀ پایدار، ۴(۲)، 169-190. https://jwsd.um.ac.ir/article_29725_1cde3e2c1b87c8d636c54165e6c3d25f.pdf
رحیمی، مجید، قربانی، مهدی، ملکیان، آرش، و علم‌بیگی، امیر (1401). تحلیل رابطه‌های نهاد-سودمندان برای حکمرانی شبکه‌ای آب در پایین‌دست آبخیز رود کر. پژوهش‌های آبخیزداری، 35(1)، 62-71. https://doi.org/10.22092/wmrj.2021.353840.1394
سروی صدرآباد، حسین و اسلامی، ایمان (۱۳۹۸). تحلیل شبکه و سرمایۀ اجتماعی درون‌گروهی در مدیریت مشارکتی منابع آب. نشریۀ علمی- پژوهشی مرتع و آبخیزداری، 72(3)، ۷۵۳-۷۳۹. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2019.282477.1389
شالچی، وحید و مهدیار، میثم (1399). بازتاب مقولات محیط زیستی در رویکردهای نظری جامعه شناسی ایران و نسبت آن با ریشههای بحران آب در ایران. فصلنامۀ دانش‌های بومی ایران، 7(13)، 53-107. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjik.2021.55653.1231
شانازی، کاروان، سعدی، حشمت‌اله، و موحدی، رضا (1399). جایگاه تعاونی‌های تولید روستایی در ظرفیت‌سازی سرمایۀ اجتماعی جوامع محلی شهرستان همدان. پژوهش‌های روستایی، 11(1)، ۱۵۷-۱۴۰. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2020.293247.1425
فاضلی، محمد (1399). ایران بر لبۀ تیغ: گفتارهای جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی و سیاست عمومی. تهران: روزنه.
فلیک، اووه (۱۳۹۴). درآمدی بر تحقیق کیفی. ترجمۀ هادی جلیلی. تهران: نشر نی.
 قربانی، مهدی، آذرنیوند، حسین، مهرابی، علی‌اکبر، باستانی، سوسن، جعفری، محمد، و نایبی، هوشنگ (۱۳۹۱). تحلیل شبکۀ اجتماعی: رویکردی نوین در سیاست‏گذاری و برنامه‏ریزی مدیریت مشارکتی منابع طبیعی. نشریۀ علمی-پژوهشی مرتع و آبخیزداری، ۶۵(۴)،‌ ۵۶۸-۵۵۳.https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2012.3205
عنبری، موسی (1394). مبانی «امر اجتماعی» روستایی: به‌سوی جامعه‌شناسی خودبسنده و بومی. نشریۀ توسعۀ محلی (روستایی-شهری)، 7(2)، ۱۹۸-۱۷۳. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrd.2015.60559
نجاتی، بهناز (1390). مقایسۀ بهره‌وری آب در نظام‌های بهره‌برداری بخش کشاورزی: مطالعۀ موردی زراعت بخش-خسوف. پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه بیرجند، ۱۸۴-۱. https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/viewer/bc71dd2c5e882d2f4d587108242db8d1
فلی وایت، راب (1398). جامعه‌شناسی محیطزیست. ترجمۀ مهدی فرهمندنژاد. تهران: ثالث.
یوسفوند، سامان (1397). نسبت امر اجتماعی و امر طبیعی؛ هم‌زیستی یا تقابل. پژوهش‌‌های جامعه‌شناسی معاصر، 7(12)، 161-194.
Aghayari Hir, M., Khorshiddoust, A.-M., Azmi, A., & Shafiei, A. (2023). The ecological sustainability assessment of rural settlements with emphasis on the ecological footprint (Case study: Eslamabad-e-Gharb County). Journal of Local Development (Rural-Urban), 14(2), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrd.2023.355037.668780 (In Persian)
Afkhami, M., Ghorbani, M., Zahraie, B., & Azadi, H. (2021). Role of social network measurements in improving adaptive capacity: The case of agricultural water users in rural areas of Western Iran. Society & Natural Resources, 34(10), 1338-1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2021.1953201
Aldridge, S., Halpern, D. & Fitzpatrick, S. (2002). Social Capital. Discussion Paper. London.
Anbari, M. (2015). Foundations of rural social fact: Towards a self-sufficient and indigenous sociology. Journal of Community Development (Rural–Urban), 7(2), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrd.2015.60559 (In Persian)
Azkia, M., & Firoozabadi, S. A. (2008). Social capital in different land tenure systems and factors affecting the transformation of peasant holdings into cooperatives. Social Sciences Letter, 16(1), 77–98. https://jnoe.ut.ac.ir/article_26977.html (In Persian)
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article/18/4/543/1090370
Ballet, J., Sirven, N., & Requiers-Desjardins, M. (2007). Social capital and natural resource management: a critical perspective. Journal of Environment & Development, 16(4), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496507310740
Banafa, T., Eräranta, S., Yletyinen, J., Pihlajamäki, M., & Keskinen, M. (2025). Collaborative water resources management: A multilayer social network analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 134335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134335
Bastani, S., & Raeisi, M. (2011). Social Network Analysis as a Method: Using Whole Network Approach for Studying FOSS Communities. Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 5(2), 31–57. http://www.jss-isa.ir/article_21463.html (In Persian)
Baker, W. E. (1990). Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 589-625. https://doi.org/10.1086/229573
Bourdieu, P. (Richardson, J ed.) (1986). ‘The forms of capital’, In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, Greenwood Press, New York.
Bodin, Ö., & Prell, C. (Eds.). (2011). Social networks and natural resource management: uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Castree, N. (2015). Changing the Anthropo(s)cene: Geographers, global environmental change and the politics of knowledge. Progress in Human Geography, 39(3), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514562155
Curran, J., Jarvis, R., Blackburn, R. A., & Black, S. (1993). Networks and small firms: constructs, methodological strategies and some findings.  International Small Business Journal, 11(2), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/026624269301100202
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2).
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Claridge, T. (2004). Social capital and natural resource management. Unpublished Thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Claridge, T. (2018). Functions of social capital–bonding, bridging, linking. Social Capital Research, 20(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7993853
Damonte, G. H. (2019). The constitution of hydrosocial power. Ecology and Society, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10873-240221
Dobbin, K. B., & Smith, D. W. (2021). Bridging social capital theory and practice: evidence from community-managed water treatment plants in Honduras.  Journal of Rural Studies, 88, 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.10.002
Dingkuhn, E. L., O’Sullivan, L., Schulte, R. P., & Grady, C. A. (2024). Navigating agricultural nonpoint source pollution governance: A social network analysis of best management practices in central Pennsylvania. Plos one, 19(5), e0303745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303745
De Groot, W. T., & Tadepally, H. (2008). Community action for environmental restoration: a case study on collective social capital in India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(4), 519-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9078-8
Ebrahimi Azarkharan, F., Ghorbani, M., Malekian, A., Salajegheh, A., Alambeygi, A., & Fahmi, H. (2019). Analysis the position of stakeholders toward to water governance in Taleghan watershed. Iranian Journal of Watershed Management Science and Engineering, 13(46), 62–73. https://dor.isc.ac/doi/20.1001.1.20089554.1398.13.46.9.5 (In Persian)
Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411-1454.
Fazeli, M. (2020). Iran on the razor’s edge: Essays in political sociology and public policy. Tehran: Rowzaneh Publishing. (In Persian)
Flick, U. (2015). An introduction to qualitative research (H. Jalili, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
Frank, K. A. (2011). Social network models for natural resource use and extraction. Social networks and natural resource management: Uncovering the Social Fabric of Environmental Governance, 180-205. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894985.009
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
Fliervoet, J., Geerling, G., Mostert, E., & Smits, A. (2016). Analyzing collaborative governance through social network analysis: A case study of river management along the Waal River in The Netherlands. Environmental Management, 57(2), 355-367. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-015-0606-x
García, M. M., Hileman, J., & Bodin, Ö. (2019). Collaboration and conflict in complex water governance systems across a development gradient. Ecology and Society, 24(3). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26796968
Ghorbani, M., Azarnivand, H., Mehrabi, A. A., Bastani, S., Jafari, M., & Nayebi, H. (2012). Social network analysis: A new approach in policy-making and planning of natural resources co-management. Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 65(4), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2012.32053 (In Persian)
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
Grootaert, C., & Van Bastelaer, T. (2002). Understanding and measuring social capital. https://libgen.li/edition.php?id=136417661
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
Hessam, M., & Negahban, S. (2020). Network Analysis Community Relations of Water Resources Beneficiaries In Order to Urban Optimize Management (Case Study: Palm Groves in the Eastern Part of the Fadami city–Darab- Fars). Human Geography Research, 52(2), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2018.261417.1007735 (In Persian)
Hobbevatan, M. (2017). Typology of water capital and social capital in Iran. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 4(2), 169–190. https://jwsd.um.ac.ir/article_29725_1cde3e2c1b87c8d636c54165e6c3d25f.pdf
Hollstein, B. (2011). Qualitative approaches. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 404–416). SAGE.
Jack, S. (2005). The Role, Use and Activation of Strong and Weak Network Ties: A Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1233–1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00540.x
Katz, E. G. (2000). Social capital and natural capital: a comparative analysis of land tenure and natural resource management in Guatemala. Land economics, University of Wisconsin Press, 114-132. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147261
Kilpatrick, S. (2007). Building social capital in groups: Facilitating skill development for natural resource management. Rural Society, 17(3), 248-257. https://doi.org/10.5172/rsj.351.17.3.248
Liu, J. (2023). A review of social–ecological system research and theoretical frameworks. Sustainability, 15(8), 6930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086930
Lin, N., & Erickson, B. H. (2008). Theory, measurement, and the research enterprise on social capital. Social capital: An international research program.
Moghfeli, Z., Ghorbani, M., Rezvani, M. R., Khorasani, M. A., Azadi, H., & Scheffran, J. (2023). Social capital and farmers’ leadership in Iranian rural communities: Application of social network analysis. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(5), 977-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.2008329 (In Persian)
Nabiafjadi, S., Sharifzadeh, M., & Ahmadvand, M. (2021). Social network analysis for identifying actors engaged in water governance: An endorheic basin case in the Middle East. Journal of Environmental Management, 288, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112376 (In Persian)
Nejati, B. (2011). Comparison of water productivity in farming systems in the agricultural sector: A case study of the crop production subsector in Khosouf district, Master’s thesis, University of Birjand, 1-184. IranDoc. https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/viewer/bc71dd2c5e882d2f4d587108242db8d1 (In Persian)
Orrick, K. (2024). An introduction to social-ecological practice theory. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00835-9
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press.
Plummer, R., & FitzGibbon, J. (2006, February). People matter: The importance of social capital in the co-management of natural resources. In Natural Resources Forum (Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 51-62). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2006.00157.x
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
Portes, A. (2024). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. New Critical Writings in Political Sociology, 53-76.
Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001). Social capital and the environment. World Development, 29(2), 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00098-X
Rahimi, M., Ghorbani, M., Malekian, A., & Alambeigi, A. (2022). Analysis of Institution-Stakeholder Relations for the Nested Water Governance in Downstream of the Kor River Basin. Watershed Management Research Journal, 35(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.22092/wmrj.2021.353840.1394
Rahimi-Feyzabad, F., Yazdanpanah, M., Gholamrezai, S., & Ahmadvand, M. (2022). Social network analysis of institutions involved in groundwater resources management: Lessons learned from Iran. Journal of Hydrology, 613, 128442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128442 (In Persian)
Sayles, J. S., Mancilla Garcia, M., Hamilton, M., Alexander, S. M., Baggio, J. A., Fischer, A. P., ... & Pittman, J. (2019). Social-ecological network analysis for sustainability sciences: a systematic review and innovative research agenda for the future. Environmental Research Letters, 14(9), 093003. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10941-240326
Scott, J. (1991). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage Publications.
Sarvi Sadrabad, H., & Islami, I. (2019). Social network analysis and bonding social capital in participatory water resources management: A case study of Sadrabad village in the Nodoushan watershed, Yazd Province. Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 72(3), 739–753. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2019.282477.1389 (In Persian)
Shalchi, V., & Mehdyar, M. (1399). Reflections of environmental concepts in theoretical approaches of Iranian sociology and their relation to the roots of Iran’s water crisis. Iranian Indigenous Knowledge Studies, 7(13), 53–107. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjik.2021.55653.1231 (In Persian)
Shanazi, K., Sadi, H., & Movahedi, R. (2020). Position of Rural Production Cooperatives in Capacity Building of Social Capital of local communities in Hamadan County. Journal of Rural Research, 11(1), 140-157. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2020.293247.1425 (In Persian)
Warner, M. (1999). Social Capital Construction and the Role of the Local State 1. Rural Sociology, 64(3), 373-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00358.x
Wang, K., Han, H., & Tan, C. (2025). The evolution of urban environmental governance networks: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 17(14), 6345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146345
United Nations. (2025). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2025: Mountains and glaciers—Water towers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54679/LHPJ5153
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Webb, T., & Cary, J. (2005). Social capital and natural resource management: An application to Landcare. Rural Society, 15(2), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.5172/rsj.351.15.2.119
White, R. (Ed.). (2019). Controversies in environmental sociology (M. Farahmandnejad, Trans.). Sales Publishing. (Original work published 2004). (In Persian)
Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151-208.
Yousefvand, S. (2017). The relationship between the social and the natural: Coexistence or conflict?
Contemporary Sociological Research, 7(21), 231–262. https://doi.org/10.22084/csr.2017.14042.1341 (In Persian)
Zahedi, A., & Maleki, A. (2020). Climate change and water scarcity in Iran: Impacts and adaptation strategies. Water Policy, 22(6), 963–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2023.101075
توسعه محلی (روستائی-شهری)
دوره 18، شماره 1
بهار و تابستان 1405
تیر 1405
صفحه 269-296